Assistants and agents
Conversational tools and task agents grounded in your data, with guardrails on what they can see and do.
The demo is the easy part. We build the AI features that hold up once real people use them on real data with real stakes.
An AI feature is simple to demo and hard to trust. The first version dazzles in a meeting and then quietly hallucinates, or answers a question it shouldn't have had access to, or saves nobody any time because it doesn't fit the actual job. The gap between the demo and the daily tool is where most of these projects die.
We build for the daily tool. The assistant talks to your real data through your real permission model, and we measure it against the work it's meant to do rather than a handful of cherry-picked prompts. The concierge on this site is one small example of how we think about it.

Conversational tools and task agents grounded in your data, with guardrails on what they can see and do.
Answers pulled from your documents and systems, with citations, so the model stops making things up.
The repetitive internal work (triage, summaries, routing) handed to a model that's been measured on it.
Test sets, monitoring, and limits so you know when the system is right and what it does when it isn't.
We pick a task where AI genuinely helps and the cost of a wrong answer is understood. Not a demo. A job.
Retrieval and permissions first, so the model answers from your reality and only sees what it should.
We build a test set from real cases and measure accuracy, so 'it feels good' becomes a number you trust.
Monitoring, fallbacks, and limits in place, then we tune it against how it performs in the wild.
Send the rough version. Within a business day, you'll get back the questions we'd ask in a kickoff and an honest read on whether we're a fit. We don't need a deck to start the conversation.